What is Moses' Role in Animal Farm: A Symbol of Hope or a Tool of Oppression?

In George Orwell’s allegorical novella Animal Farm, Moses the raven occupies a unique and often overlooked role. While the other animals are preoccupied with the revolution, the establishment of Animalism, and the subsequent corruption of their ideals, Moses stands apart as a figure who represents something entirely different. His role in the story is multifaceted, serving as both a symbol of hope and a tool of oppression, depending on how one interprets his actions and the reactions of the other animals. This article will explore Moses’ role in Animal Farm from various perspectives, examining his significance as a religious figure, his relationship with the pigs, and his impact on the other animals.
Moses as a Religious Figure
Moses is introduced early in the novel as a tame raven who is “Mr. Jones’s especial pet.” He is known for his tales of a mysterious place called Sugarcandy Mountain, a paradise where animals go after they die. In this paradise, “it was Sunday seven days a week, clover was in season all the year round, and lump sugar and linseed cake grew on the hedges.” This description is strikingly similar to the concept of heaven in many religious traditions, particularly Christianity. Moses’ role as a religious figure is further emphasized by the fact that he is the only animal on the farm who does not participate in the rebellion or the subsequent work on the farm. Instead, he spends his time spreading his message of Sugarcandy Mountain, offering the animals a vision of a better life beyond their current struggles.
From one perspective, Moses can be seen as a symbol of hope. His tales of Sugarcandy Mountain provide the animals with a sense of comfort and solace, especially in the face of the harsh realities of their lives on the farm. For many of the animals, the idea of a paradise where they will be free from suffering and oppression is a powerful motivator. It gives them something to look forward to, even if it is only after death. In this sense, Moses serves as a kind of spiritual leader, offering the animals a form of escapism that helps them cope with their difficult circumstances.
However, Moses’ role as a religious figure can also be interpreted in a more negative light. Some critics argue that his tales of Sugarcandy Mountain are a form of manipulation, designed to keep the animals docile and compliant. By encouraging the animals to focus on an afterlife rather than their present conditions, Moses effectively distracts them from the injustices they face on the farm. This interpretation aligns with Karl Marx’s famous assertion that religion is the “opium of the people,” a tool used by the ruling class to pacify the masses and prevent them from rising up against their oppressors. In this view, Moses is not a symbol of hope but rather a tool of oppression, serving the interests of the pigs by keeping the other animals in a state of passive acceptance.
Moses’ Relationship with the Pigs
Moses’ relationship with the pigs is another important aspect of his role in Animal Farm. Initially, the pigs are openly hostile towards Moses and his tales of Sugarcandy Mountain. After the rebellion, when the animals are establishing the principles of Animalism, Moses is explicitly excluded from the new order. The pigs, particularly Snowball, dismiss his stories as “lies” and “rubbish,” and they actively discourage the other animals from listening to him. This hostility can be seen as an attempt by the pigs to assert their authority and control over the animals’ beliefs. By discrediting Moses and his religious message, the pigs are able to establish themselves as the sole arbiters of truth and ideology on the farm.
However, as the story progresses, the pigs’ attitude towards Moses begins to change. After Napoleon consolidates his power and the farm becomes increasingly oppressive, Moses is allowed to return and continue spreading his tales of Sugarcandy Mountain. This shift in the pigs’ attitude is significant, as it suggests that they have come to see Moses as a useful tool for maintaining control over the other animals. By allowing Moses to preach his message of an afterlife, the pigs are able to divert the animals’ attention away from the injustices they face in the present. In this way, Moses becomes complicit in the pigs’ regime, whether intentionally or not.
Some critics argue that Moses’ return to the farm is a deliberate strategy on the part of the pigs to reinforce their authority. By allowing Moses to spread his religious message, the pigs are able to create a sense of false hope among the animals, making them less likely to question or challenge the status quo. This interpretation aligns with the idea that religion can be used as a tool of social control, particularly in oppressive regimes. In this view, Moses is not an independent figure but rather an extension of the pigs’ power, serving their interests by keeping the other animals in a state of passive acceptance.
Moses’ Impact on the Other Animals
Moses’ impact on the other animals is another important aspect of his role in Animal Farm. While some animals are initially skeptical of his tales of Sugarcandy Mountain, others are deeply influenced by his message. For these animals, Moses’ stories provide a sense of comfort and hope, offering them a vision of a better life beyond their current struggles. This is particularly true for the more vulnerable and less intelligent animals, such as the sheep and the hens, who are less able to understand or resist the pigs’ propaganda.
However, Moses’ impact on the other animals is not entirely positive. By encouraging the animals to focus on an afterlife rather than their present conditions, Moses effectively distracts them from the injustices they face on the farm. This can be seen as a form of escapism, which prevents the animals from taking action to improve their lives. In this sense, Moses’ role is similar to that of the pigs, who also use propaganda and manipulation to maintain control over the other animals. Both Moses and the pigs serve to keep the animals in a state of passive acceptance, preventing them from rising up against their oppressors.
Some critics argue that Moses’ impact on the other animals is ultimately detrimental, as it undermines their ability to think critically and take action. By encouraging the animals to focus on an afterlife, Moses effectively discourages them from questioning the status quo or seeking to change their circumstances. This interpretation aligns with the idea that religion can be used as a tool of social control, particularly in oppressive regimes. In this view, Moses is not a symbol of hope but rather a tool of oppression, serving the interests of the pigs by keeping the other animals in a state of passive acceptance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Moses’ role in Animal Farm is complex and multifaceted. He serves as both a symbol of hope and a tool of oppression, depending on how one interprets his actions and the reactions of the other animals. As a religious figure, Moses offers the animals a vision of a better life beyond their current struggles, providing them with a sense of comfort and solace. However, his tales of Sugarcandy Mountain can also be seen as a form of manipulation, designed to keep the animals docile and compliant. Moses’ relationship with the pigs further complicates his role, as he is initially dismissed by the pigs but later allowed to return and continue spreading his message. This shift in the pigs’ attitude suggests that they have come to see Moses as a useful tool for maintaining control over the other animals. Ultimately, Moses’ impact on the other animals is both positive and negative, offering them a sense of hope while also discouraging them from taking action to improve their lives.
Related Questions
-
How does Moses’ role in Animal Farm reflect Orwell’s views on religion?
- Orwell’s portrayal of Moses as a religious figure can be seen as a critique of organized religion, particularly its potential to be used as a tool of social control. By depicting Moses as a figure who distracts the animals from their present struggles, Orwell suggests that religion can be used to pacify the masses and prevent them from challenging oppressive regimes.
-
Why do the pigs initially dismiss Moses but later allow him to return?
- The pigs initially dismiss Moses because they see his tales of Sugarcandy Mountain as a threat to their authority. However, as the farm becomes increasingly oppressive, the pigs come to see Moses as a useful tool for maintaining control over the other animals. By allowing Moses to spread his message of an afterlife, the pigs are able to divert the animals’ attention away from the injustices they face in the present.
-
What is the significance of Sugarcandy Mountain in Animal Farm?
- Sugarcandy Mountain serves as a symbol of hope and escapism for the animals. It represents a vision of a better life beyond their current struggles, offering them a sense of comfort and solace. However, it also serves as a tool of oppression, as it distracts the animals from the injustices they face on the farm and discourages them from taking action to improve their lives.
-
How does Moses’ role in Animal Farm compare to the role of religion in real-life oppressive regimes?
- Moses’ role in Animal Farm can be compared to the role of religion in real-life oppressive regimes, where it is often used as a tool of social control. By encouraging the masses to focus on an afterlife rather than their present conditions, oppressive regimes are able to maintain control and prevent the people from rising up against their oppressors. In this sense, Moses serves as a metaphor for the ways in which religion can be used to pacify and manipulate the masses.